.....Without the need for a bigger battery pack.
Friday 1st March 2024
The ability to control net energy gain (NEG) or the Q-Factor of an energy source will significantly increase the efficiency with which a power plant is able to supply electricity, whether it is to a grid or to power a vehicle. It has been explained at length how C-Drives convert centrifugal force into thrust and torque using the Three (3) Simple Steps. The thrust created by C-Drives is very much like that created by jets and rockets, however, while jets and rockets eject their exhaust, C-Drives are unique in that they are designed to recycle exhaust as has been shown using HD-SRMF. Therefore, C-Drives are zero emission in line with current climate change objectives being pursued around the world. In order to generate propulsion that streams the mass flow (HD-SRMF) in a net direction C-Drives change polarity every 180 degrees of rotation. Whether C-Drives are used as air taxis to more safely create highways in the sky, or for entry and re-entry in the aerospace sector or to improve the efficiency of energy generation the positive impact on climate they can have through transportation and improving energy efficiency can be quite significant. See the rational for the 300,000Km to 500,000Km range.
Normally this kind of range and long life is associated with submarines fitted with nuclear reactors as the vehicle's power plant. These can remain submerged for months without the need to resurface. They can continue to operate for up to 30 years without the need to refuel. However, as we have seen, using angular momentum to control net energy gain (NEG) or the Q-Factor of an input energy source demonstrated by the Three (3) Simple Steps, C-Drives can compete and in some conditions even outperform nuclear energy gaining attributes of longevity and high electrical output observed in kind of power plants kitted on nuclear submarines. Technically it is generally accepted that the source of nuclear energy is the mass excitement of particles that themselves gain their energetic state emerging or launched from orbitals or angular momentum (like the experiment that demonstrates a fission chain reaction using ping pong balls launched from mousetraps with springs except in a C-Drive energy like, orbitals, is stored in a centrifuge instead of spring). It should therefore come as no surprise that precision controlled angular momentum (seen in Step 1 of the Three Simple Steps) such as that observed in centrifugal force will share similar attributes with nuclear energy, because its the same mechanism simply engineered to a larger scale.
When you attach a rock to a string and begin to spin it, this mimics an orbital in an atom (angular momentum in a C-Drive), when you cut the string and release the rock this mimics the chaotic release of nuclear energy in a given mass. Materials that have weak strings that easily snap and release the rock (energy) are called fissile materials e.g. highly enriched uranium and plutonium. Nuclear energy is formidable because of the innumerable particles in a given mass participating in the process of a chaotic release of energy, other than this, fundamentally, the process is very basic and simple.
The magnitude of the release of energy is governed in part by angular momentum in orbitals of particles. The higher the angular momentum the more energetic the release, the greater the nuclear energy. Energy is really just a manipulation of mass and angular momentum on a nuclear scale that can be mimicked using C-Drives. Therefore, C-Drives can use mass and angular momentum to control the Q-Factor of any input energy source by increasing or decreasing angular momentum (rpm) be it solar, hydro, wind and so on, the input source is referred to as the exciter and gives this kind of system the properties thought "special" in nuclear types of energy .i.e. long operational life and high energy output. Hence, the huge amounts of thrust, torque, electricity, range, horsepower (HP) C-Drives can produce when understood are not "special" either.
Once this energy becomes available from angular momentum (centrifugal force) all the C-Drive does is convert it into thrust (Step 2) or torque (Step 3). C-Drives have the added advantage of being a clean energy source. See the six figure Q-factor of a 2m diameter C-Drive.
Which is the best propulsion tech of the future?
Why has this taken so long to understand? It has taken this long because science and physics globally, to this day, believes in fields, and that a given mass cannot gain buoyancy without the presence of a medium to rest on, which is false. Hence, a C-Drive could only be designed by debunking this belief using an alternative approach that dismisses the existence of fields e.g. "no medium, no fields" referred to as the FDNEH. See proof of concept. A scientist upgrading his or her theoretical frame work from fields to no fields is by no means an easy task. This can be viewed as a break with tradition or customary thought therefore there will be a significant amount of internal struggle involved in "exorcising" fields from the mind, analysis and thought process. However, once fields are shaken off and the perception of no-fields opens the mind, it is without doubt that an elevated perception is gained by a scientist now able to function at a lower handicap.
As explained in the last paragraph a C-Drive may look like a simple device, however, what it can achieve will surpass most of what is known, practiced and built today, for example in energy and propulsion. This is because technically it could not be rationalised and therefore could not be built by current levels of knowledge in physics and the sciences in general, which is referred to as Stage II levels of knowledge or understanding whereas reasoning and knowledge that is produced without fields as the lower handicap applied to analysis is referred to as a more advanced and accurate Stage III level of knowledge and understanding.
For instance, a Stage III scientist on observing a field, for example, gravitational field around a star or a magnetic field around a bar magnet will know that what is observed is in fact a field effect, meaning he or she knows the field does not exist and what is being observed is in fact illusory, there is no field there whatsoever, which entails their powers of observation are keenly above that of a lesser Stage II scientist or physicist. When a Stage II scientist sees an asteroid attracted by a planet, he or she sees a distortion of Space-Time around the planet which creates geodesics that alter the course of the asteroid causing it to slingshot into a new direction. A Stage III scientist recognizes that this presence of a medium or field is an illusion and what is being observed is a field effect, there is no medium or field that alters the asteroid's course making it slingshot. The Stage III scientist recognizes that the Stage II scientist is making observations based on a flawed theoretical framework, possibly indoctrinated, imbued or inculcated by the education regime imposed on them. Therefore, he or she, is by design incapable of reading and solving observations or clearly understanding certain aspects of the sciences, especially related to physics where gravity is the subject being studied.
Stage II scientists are easy to identify as they operate with a flawed theoretical framework. The consequence of this is that they make many false assumptions some which they can test empirically and believe are accurate and consequently mislead the general public. For example, they believe in time travel, that a person from the future can arrive in our present, a person can go into the past and make changes that will alter the future and so on. They believe in time dilation. They think that an object floats on water because it displaces its mass (Archimedes Principle). They believe a coffee cup rests on top of a table or that matter is tangible due to magnetic fields. They believe in gravitational lensing (that light bends in a non-existent gravitational field). They believe there is a magnetic field around a bar magnet. They believe gravity is a pervasive geometry or field that fills space, when that field does not exist. They believe in time, when in fact what they believe in is not time but motion. These flawed primitive science models are easy to identify, all that is required is to remove the field content to see that the assumptions are flawed, the science or thought is simply primitive or backward. And of course they continue to teach this content to students across the world even at advanced levels of the sciences.
.gif)