Comparing AMT-TOE to the Standard Model Lagrangian
Updated List of Negations
(the bullshit list)
Analyzed with Grok
Notes:
C-Drives are expected to have a lift force greater than hydraulic systems. Whereas the maximum multiplication of force for hydraulic systems is around 800:1 the lift force from C-Drives is expected to be around 25,000:1. C-Drives have the added advantage in that they can anchor themselves in mid air using the ratio as propulsive force.
In addition to this equations show C-Drives are expected to be able to generate sufficient thrust with which to launch a 5 tonne mass to the speed of light in 9 to 20 minutes (relativistic effects set aside).
The C-Drive mechanism as a force multiplier is unique in that unlike hydraulic systems it's force multiplication is a form of thrust. Therefore, not only can it's 25,000:1 rating be compared to hydraulic lift systems, it can also be compared to the lift force of both jet aircraft and rockets.
Jet Engines
The most powerful commercial jet engines in the world tap out at a thrust to weight ratio of around 5.2:1.
Rockets
The table below shows the most powerful rockets in the world tap out at a thrust to weight ratio of 183 6:1.
Both jets and rockets are far below the expected 25,000:1 thrust to weight ratio of C-Drives.
(e.g. A thrust to weight ratio at this level means mining companies can begin to put in place serious plans for mining operations in space)
High Density Mass Flow Comparison
C-Drives are 6,367 times more efficient than jet engines
C-Drives are 39,000 times more efficient than rocket engines
In terms of mass flow.
...............
No comments:
Post a Comment